Legal Opinion

State v. Peck

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 22, 2009No. A08-579PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.

A person commits a first-degree controlled-substance crime if that person possesses one or more “mixtures” that contain a controlled substance and that weigh 25 grams or more. Minn.Stat. § 152.021, subd. 2(1) (2008). In this appeal we consider whether the term “mixture” applies to bong water that tests positive for the presence of a controlled substance. Appellant State of Minnesota charged respondent Sara Ruth Peck with several drug-related offenses, including first-degree possession of a controlled substance. The first-degree possession charge alleged that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State v. LogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. State v. RudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. MauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  3. Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API