Legal Opinion
Loxtercamp v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 11, 1986No. C4-85-1624PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Respondent Daniel Loxtercamp’s driving privileges were revoked when he failed a breathalyzer test with a .10 reading. He petitioned for judicial review, and the trial court rescinded the revocation. The Commissioner of Public Safety appeals from the trial court’s order. We reverse.
FACTS
On September 1, 1984, Loxtercamp was involved in an automobile accident. State Trooper Ronald Leasman arrived at the scene, observed indicia of intoxication, and asked Loxtercamp to take a preliminary breath test. Loxtercamp did so and failed the test. The Todd County Sheriff arrived, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State, City of St. Louis Park v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- State, Department of Public Safety v. HabischSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Bielejeski v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Hrncir v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Meehan v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
- Lara v. TanakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Barna v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Nelson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993