State, Department of Public Safety v. Habisch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, Justice.
This appeal reviews a license revocation hearing under the implied consent law, Minn.Stat. § 169.123 (1978), and raises the issue of whether the trial court was correct in concluding that the state had established sufficient foundation for admitting the results of a Breathalyzer test. 1 That test placed defendant’s blood alcohol content at .16%. The district court reversed and we granted the state leave to appeal. We reverse the district court.
The precise issue at the revocation hearing was whether the known alcohol solution used to test the Breathalyzer was too old to be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State, City of St. Louis Park v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
3Cited by30 opinions
- Pladson v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Tate v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Berger v. State Highway CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. GrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Noren v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.