Legal Opinion
Hrncir v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 2, 1985No. C5-85-109PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellant Vickie Sue Hrncir seeks review of the trial court’s decision sustaining revocation of her driver’s license because she produced a reading of .10 percent blood alcohol content on an intoxilyzer. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 30, 1984, appellant was arrested by a Minnesota State Trooper for driving while under the influence of alcohol in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121. Appellant was read the Minnesota Implied Consent Advisory and, after contacting an attorney, consented to take a breath test.
An intoxilyzer test was administered by the trooper, a certified…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schildgen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Grund v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barcott v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Nugent v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Wieseler v. PrinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Holstein v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.