Legal Opinion
Barna v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 16, 1993No. CO-93-970PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
John Earl Barna’s driving privileges were revoked pursuant to the implied consent statute. See Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 4 (1992) (requiring Commissioner of Public Safety to revoke a person’s license if found driving a motor vehicle with an alcohol concentration of 0.10 or more). After a hearing, the trial court sustained that revocation. On appeal, Barna argues: (1) the trial court erred in admitting the results of his blood test; and (2) there is insufficient evidence to sustain the revocation. We affirm.
FACTS
The arresting officer noticed Barna’s vehicle stopped at a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. JobeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State, City of St. Louis Park v. QuinnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. KirschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. AguilarNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Wilkes v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010