Legal Opinion

Tate v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1984No. C5-84-83PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

The Commissioner’s revocation of appellant’s drivers license was sustained by the trial court. The appeal questions the adequacy of foundation for admitting into evidence a breathalyzer test result. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant was arrested in November 1988, after failing a preliminary breath test. At the Chemical Testing Unit of the Minneapolis Police Department, she consented to a breathalyzer test. Based on the results of that test, her license was revoked.

The test was administered by the arresting officer, Jon DeLuney. Officer DeLu-ney completed the twenty-five steps…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Bisbee v. RuppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. State, Department of Public Safety v. HabischSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Dick v. MolitorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hager v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Noren v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Kooi v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Melin v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Przymus v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API