Legal Opinion
Potter Instrument Co. v. Mohawk Data Sciences Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 3, 1969No. 69 Civ. 2061PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendant, alleging lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, moves pursuant to Rules 12(b) (1) and (6) of the Fed.R.Civ.P., respectively, for an order dismissing Paragraph 13 of plaintiff’s complaint and Paragraph (b) of the Demand for Judgment. By its complaint, which is founded upon 28 U. S.C. § 1338 and 35 U.S.C. § 146, plaintiff seeks to set aside a determination by the United States Patent Office in an interference proceeding by which priority of invention on two patent claims was *867awarded to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Monsanto Company v. KampDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- Sperry Rand Corporation, John Presper Eckert, Jr., and John W. Mauchly v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Radio Corporation of America v. Philco CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Sperry Rand Corporation, John Presper Eckert, Jr., and John W. Mauchly v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Montecatini Edison, S.P.A. (A Corporation of Italy) v. Karl Ziegler, and E. I. Dupont De Nemours and Company (A Corporation of Delaware)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Stamicarbon, N v. v. Chemical Construction Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Standard Oil Co. v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.