Legal Opinion
Sperry Rand Corporation, John Presper Eckert, Jr., and John W. Mauchly v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 10, 1963No. 244, Docket 27908PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action under Section 146 of the Patent Statutes (35 U.S.C. § 146), 1 to review a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences determining the issue of priority of inven tíon in favor of the defendant. The district court reversed the decision of the Board and authorized the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent to the plaintiffs. For the reasons set forth hereafter we grant appellees’ motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal from the judgment of the district court.
The invention here in issue involves the basic design of the electronic computer…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Cover v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
3Cited by12 opinions
- Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Alan ShiffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Dix-Seal Corporation v. New Haven Trap Rock CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.