Standard Oil Co. v. Montedison
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MARIS, Circuit Judge.
These are appeals taken pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) from an interlocutory order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware denying motions by the plaintiffs, Standard Oil Company (herein Standard Oil), E. I. duPont de Nemours & Company (herein duPont) and Phillips Petroleum Company (herein Phillips), for leave to amend their complaints in civil actions filed in the district court to review, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 146, an award of priority of invention made by the Board of Patent Interferences of the Patent Office, now known…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Conservolite, Inc. v. Don F. WidmayerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Home Products International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- General Instrument Corporation, Inc. v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Grefco, Inc. v. Kewanee Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.