Legal Opinion
Stamicarbon, N v. v. Chemical Construction Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 14, 1973No. Civ. A. 4442PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LATCHUM, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the motion of the defendant, Chemical Construction Corporation (“Chemico”), to compel the plaintiff, Stamicarbon, N.V. (“Stamicarbon”), pursuant to Rule 37(a), F.R.Civ.P., to answer interrogatories and to produce all documents identified by Stamicarbon in its answers to the interrogatories. Stamicarbon has refused the discovery on the ground that the information sought pertains to issues which may not be raised in this action. Before considering the specific information sought, it is necessary to understand how this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Eccles v. Peoples Bank of Lakewood VillageSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. American Anode, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Milton Roy Co. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbHDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Smithkline Corporation v. Sterling Drug, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Standard Oil Co. v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.