Legal Opinion

Pacific Live Stock Co. v. Ellison Ranching Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1930No. 2448, 2449PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Ry the Court,

Sanders, J.:

These appeals concern adjudications of conflicting rights of the parties to the use of the waters of Quinn River and its tributaries in Humboldt County, which were made many years ago by Hon. E. J. L. Taber, judge of the Fourth judicial district, acting as judge pro tern, of the Sixth judicial district. The adjudications were made at the suit of the Pacific Live Stock Company, a lower proprietor, against upper proprietors of land irrigated from said river and the tributaries thereof. The decree adjudicates as many as sixty appropriative rights for irrigation,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Union Mill & Mining Co. v. DangbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
  3. Herriman v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Johnson v. Phenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Niles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. McCormick v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Scherer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Whitcomb v. MurphyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Cramer v. State, Department of Motor VehiclesNevada Supreme Court · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API