Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Bullard

California Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1896No. S. F. No. 564PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, settling the accounts of the administrator of the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Motion to dismiss the appeal. The administrator of the estate of the above-named decedent rendered to the superior court his account of the administration of said estate for settlement, and in connection therewith reported a claim against the estate in favor of the Hibernia Savings and Loan Society, which had been presented and allowed by him, for the sum of eighteen hundred and sixteen dollars and twenty-five cents, and afterward approved by the judge and filed in the court. On the hearing of the settlement of said *463account one of the heirs of the decedent contested the allowance of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Herriman v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McCurrie v. DelaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. California Trust Co. v. CassidyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Lilienkamp v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Estate of McDougaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. In re Estate of ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Niles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API