Bilby v. Halsell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THRIGADGIDL, O.-
Plaintiffs in error were defendants and defendant in ;enror was plaintiff in the trial court and, for convenience, they will be referred to herein as they were there.
Plaintiff brought suit against defendants on a covenant of warranty in a deed which was in the usual form and among other items warranted the title against all taxes, the only exceptions being a mortgage for purchase price and existing leases. A copy of the deed was attached to plaintiff’s petition. Plaintiff claimed and alleged that at the time the deied was given there were taxes due and unpaid,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Clarke v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Gage v. HamptonIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Simanovich v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Baker v. L. C. Van Ness & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harry v. HertzlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Myrick v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- McConnell v. GoucherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Board of County Com'rs of Seminole County v. Griffith Realty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951