Board of County Com'rs of Seminole County v. Griffith Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Defendant in error, as plaintiff in the trial court, filed its petition alleging that it was the owner of certain real estate in the town of Maud; that defendants claimed some lien thereon, the exact nature of which was unknown to plaintiff but that said claim constituted a cloud on plaintiff’s title. On information and belief plaintiff further alleged that defendants’ claim arose by virtue of alleged unpaid ad valorem taxes for certain years but that plaintiff had paid all 'taxes legally assessed against it. It is further alleged that the tax rolls for the years in question had become…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Seminole County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Fitzsimmons v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Burgess v. NailCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Fitzgerald v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Billingsley v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956