Legal Opinion

Simanovich v. Wood

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 20, 1887PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, C. J.

This is an action of contract on a covenant against incumbrances in a deed from the defendant to the plaintiff. It is admitted that an unpaid assessment upon the land was an incumbrance within the covenant. Carr v. Dooley, 119 Mass. 294. The defendant offered to prove, by paroi testimony, that, at the time the deed was given, and as a part of the consideration, the plaintiff promised to pay said assessment.

This evidence was rightly rejected. It directly varied and contradicted the written contract of the defendant. The covenant is against all incumbrances. The evidence offered was for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carr v. DooleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. White v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
  3. Security Bank of Minnesota v. FoggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ElmenTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Orpin v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Clapp v. WilderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Wood v. JamesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  5. Rooney v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API