Legal Opinion
Myrick v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 4, 1936No. 23727PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.
The plaintiff recovered a verdict against the defendant city for personal injuries caused by the latter’s negligence. The trial judge then sustained defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the plaintiff appeals from that order. The appeal is by transcript, containing none of the evidence.
The facts are: On May 23, 1930, plaintiff filed her petition in which it was alleged that the act of negligence, resulting in her injury, occurred on November 8, 1923. Therefore her cause of action was barred by the two-year statute of limitation unless the petition on its face…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hanna v. GreggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- McAlester v. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Bilby v. HalsellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Diamond v. Enid Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mason v. McNealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Martin v. National Bank of ClaremoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Stillwater Milling Co. v. First National Bank of WewokaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Peoples Electric Co-Operative v. BroughtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- City of Tulsa v. MyrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.