Baker v. L. C. Van Ness & Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Canadian County; C. F. Irwin, Judge. Action by L. C. Van Ness & Co., against E. L. Baker. Judg ment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Citing: Choctaw Lumber Co. v. Gilmore., 11 Olda. 462; Byers v. Bourret (Cal.) 28 Pae. 61; North v. Moore (Cal.) 67 Pae. 1037; Siveeney v. Stanford (Cal.) 8 Pae. 462.
1Opinion of the Court
TüRNER, J.
On July 29, 1905, L. C. Van Ness and C. A. Van Ness, partners doing business-in El Reno, Okla., as L. C. Var. Ness & Co., sued Emma L. Baker in replevin in the district court of Canadian county to recover a certain stock of goods, wares, and merchandise, claiming a special ownership therein by virtue of a certain chattel -mortgage thereon, securing to them certain prom issory notes, which said notes and mortgages were made, executed, and delivered by defendant to plaintiff on September 1, 1904, and were due and unpaid and filed as exhibits to plaintiff’s petition. Later plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- A. W. Swope & Son v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Byers v. BourretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Sweeney v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Higby v. AyresSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Choctaw Lumber Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Bleecker v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Taylor v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Fitch v. BraddockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Standard Sewing MacH. Co. v. New State Shirt & Overall Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.