County of Los Angeles v. Commission on State Mandates
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MUNOZ (AURELIO), J. *
A 1995 amendment to Penal Code section 13519 1 requires local law enforcement officers to participate in two hours of domestic violence training. The issue on appeal is whether this amendment resulted in a reimbursable state-mandated program within the meaning of article XIII B, section 6 of the California Constitution for the time spent by local law enforcement officers in such domestic violence training, although such officers were already required to spend 24 hours in continuing education training and the domestic violence training could be included within this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- County of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Carmel Valley Fire Protection v. State of Calif.California Court of Appeal · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- California School Boards Ass'n v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Grossmont Union High School District v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Booke v. County of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Coast Community College Dist. v. Com. on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Coast Community College Dist. v. Com. on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020