Legal Opinion

San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1992No. S018200PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PANELLI, J.

California’s voters, by adopting Proposition 4, placed a constitutional spending limit on appropriations by the state and local governments. (See Cal. Const., art. XIII B, § 1, added by initiative measure in *574Special Statewide Elec. (Nov. 6, 1979).) The measure sets out, for the purpose of calculating each governmental entity’s spending limit, those categories of appropriations that are and are not subject to limitation. We granted review to decide which of the measure’s provisions determines the treatment of a city’s contributions to employee retirement funds that were…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Conservatorship of WendlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API