Legal Opinion

Grossmont Union High School District v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 2008No. C056138PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORRISON, J.

The County of San Diego (County) and other counties provided mental health services to special education students. When the Legislature slashed the funding for such services to $1,000 statewide, the County sought and obtained a superior court judgment holding that because this was an unfunded state mandate, the County did not have to provide such services. In response, the State Department of Education (Department) required local school districts to absorb the costs of these services.

Grossmont Union High School District (Grossmont) sued the Department, primarily seeking a…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. American Indian Model Schools v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. California School Boards Ass'n v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Marzec v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. v. Yee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. California Department of Human Resources v. Service Employees International UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API