Legal Opinion
Yetman v. Naumann
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 20, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1148PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
Petitioners, plaintiffs below, filed a special action in the superior court alleging that the respondent is a member of the Arizona State Board of Health, that the said board is now considering a petition filed by Phelps-Dodge Corporation, American Smelting & Refining Company and eight other copper companies to reduce or modify certain state air pollution standards and further alleging in Paragraphs V & VI of their complaint:
“V
Defendant is chairman of the Board of M. M. Sundt Construction Company. Payments to defendant by the M. M. Sundt Construction Company exceed five percent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Stigall v. City of TaftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Sakrison v. PierceArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. ScofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Moody v. ShuffletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hughes v. JorgensonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Smith v. DorseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. NippsOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.