Legal Opinion
State v. Nipps
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 1979No. 79AP-227PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This appeal is taken from the judgment and sentence entered in the Franklin County Municipal Court pursuant to a jury verdict finding the defendant-appellant, John P. Nipps, guilty of violating the Ohio “Revolving Door” law, R. C. 102.03.
On September 28, 1978, an indictment was returned by the Franklin County Grand Jury, charging defendant with a violation of R. C. 102.03(A). The indictment states that John P. Nipps acted as follows on August 30, 1977:
“Being former Chief, Bureau of Fiscal Review, Ohio Department of Public Welfare, a public official or employee of a public agency, as defined…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- In re Guzmán GéigelSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1982
- Indiana State Ethics Commission v. NelsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Musto v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Brinkman v. BudishDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.