Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 30, 2007No. 1 CA-CR 05-0200PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVINE, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Kevin Ross appeals from his conviction and sentence for violating the conflict of interest prohibition of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 38-504(C) (2001). He argues that taking and using publicly available information from his own agency for his own business purposes cannot be considered using his position to secure any valuable thing or valuable benefit that is of such character as to manifest a substantial and improper influence with respect to his duties. We agree, and therefore reverse his conviction and sentence.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hughes v. JorgensonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. CarlosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ruben M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Mathews v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State v. HindenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State of Arizona v. Tynerial Ray KindredCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API