Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Elia

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1919No. Civil No. 1607PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Apache. George H. Crosby, Jr., Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

It appears that appellee, as a creditor of the estate of Nasif Tamer, presented to the administrator and the judge of probate her verified claim against the estate for $6,680. A hearing thereon, at which evidence to support the claim was submitted by claimant, and evidence to defeat the claim was submitted by appellants “ J. W. Clayton, guardian ad litem for Reginald Flake and Joseph Tamer, Abram Tamer and Reiser Tamer,” was had. Whereupon “it -was by the court ordered . . . that the claim of Elena Elia for the return of personal property be allowed in the amount of six thousand six hundred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. In re Estate of SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Zahn v. ObertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Wise v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Presbury v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Balke's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Roberts v. RobertsWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Latham v. McClennyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Staley v. Estate of HarberArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Valley National Bank v. TammsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API