Legal Opinion
Zahn v. Obert
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 27, 1916No. 7637PublishedCited by 29 opinions
Error from District Court, Caddo County; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by Abe Zahn against M. Obert and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DAVIS, C.
The motion to dismiss, omitting the caption and mere formal parts, reads as follows:
“Comes the defendant in error, B. W. Ham-mert, and moves the court to dismiss the petition in error herein for the following reasons, to wit: The judgment in the lower court was rendered March 8, 1915. The plaintiff below, who is the only plaintiff in error in this court, died July 14, 1915, as shown by a certified copy of the application for revivor', which is attached hereto, made part hereof, and marked ‘Exhibit A’ and the petition in error was not filed here until the 8th day of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Morrison v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Gibbons v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- In Re TalleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Maas v. DunmyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Clayton v. EliaArizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Perry v. SnyderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Chouteau v. HossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- In Re Guardianship of Winnett v. RiberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.