Latham v. McClenny
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.
May 26th, 1926, Herman Schoenewald died in Maricopa county, Arizona, and thereafter Karl Hoerath filed his application to be appointed as the administrator of the estate of Schoenewald, which petition on June 14th, 1926, was duly granted, and he qualified, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, a corporation, hereinafter called the company, being the surety on his administrator’s bond. An order for publication of notice to creditors was duly made, and notice was published in accord anee therewith. The notice called for the presentation of claims within four months after the first publication,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Laun v. KippWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reese v. CraditCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Fernandez v. GarzaArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Estate of SullivanArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Hill v. FavourArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Lowry v. CrandallArizona Supreme Court · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.