Legal Opinion

Presbury v. Pickett

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Sixmper district court; James A. Ray, judge. Action by J. H. Pickett against George Presbury and J. H. Cager. • Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Presbury brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cole, J. :

The plaintiff in error executed and delivered to E. B. Pickett his promissory note, about January 1, 1887, and afterward, and before the payment of the same, E. B. Pickett died. This action was. brought upon said note by the defendant as the heir at law of said E. B. Pickett. Upon the trial of the case evidence was admitted, over the objection of *632the defendant below, plaintiff in error, tending to show the death of E. B. Pickett; that he died inr testate; that his father, plaintiff below, was his only heir; and that the intestate died leaving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. James F. Redhead & Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1895
  2. Humphreys v. KeithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zahn v. ObertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Clayton v. EliaArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Campbell v. BohanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HoustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Rexroad v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API