Legal Opinion

Wise v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1891No. 13071PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This was a suit for the fpreclosure of a mortgage. The trial court gave judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiffs appealed.

This is the second time the case has come before the appellate court. The former judgment, which was upon demurrer, was reversed upon the ground that the complaint was not subject to the objections taken by the demurrer; and the court held, among other things, that the allowance of a claim by an administrator, and its approval by the judge, stopped the running of the statute of limitations. (See 72 Cal. 544.) As a matter of course, nothing that was then…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wise v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Bollinger v. ManningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Camp v. GriderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Mechanics' Building & Loan Ass'n v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. StrycharskiTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Northern Texas Traction Co. v. City of PolytechnicTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Clayton v. EliaArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  4. In re BaileyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1910
  5. Harmdierks v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API