Legal Opinion

People v. Harbison

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 2014No. B251492PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*978Opinion

PERREN, J.

Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (the Act), was approved by the voters in the November 7, 2000, General Election. The Act dramatically changed the options for sentencing defendants convicted of nonviolent drug possession offenses,1 “[Notwithstanding any other provision of law.” (Pen. Code, § 1210.1, subd. (a).)2 As with sentencing pursuant to the determinate, indeterminate, and violent sex crime statutes, the Act establishes yet another unique alternative sentencing scheme. (See People v. Neely (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 787, 798-800 & fn. 7…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. AlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. BricenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davis v. Fresno Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. People v. SalmorinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. ElizaldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Davis v. Fresno Unified School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API