Legal Opinion

Horwich v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1999No. S073129PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In this case, we must determine whether Civil Code section 3333.4 (all unspecified statutory references are to the Civil Code), enacted as *275part of Proposition 213, precludes a wrongful death plaintiff whose decedent was the uninsured operator of a motor vehicle involved in an accident from recovering damages for loss of care, comfort, and society. We conclude recovery is permissible and therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

Factual and Procedural Background

Melissa Acuna was killed in an automobile accident; she did not have personal automobile insurance or any…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API