Legal Opinion

People v. Salmorin

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 2016No. B264614PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SEGAL, J.

INTRODUCTION

After pleading no contest to forgery, Julius Fernando Salmorin petitioned to recall his sentence under Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act (Pen. Code, § 1170.18). The trial court denied the petition, concluding the aggregate value of the checks Salmorin was convicted of forging made him ineligible for resentencing. Because the trial court erred by aggregating the face amounts of the forged checks, we reverse.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2013 the People charged Salmorin and Debra Lynn Spratt with three felonies: forgery (§ 470, subd. (d)),…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. CorreaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. FrancoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. LoweryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. People v. PakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. Aguirre, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. AguirreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API