People v. Alford
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
Penal Code section 1465.8, subdivision (a)(1)1 requires the imposition of a $20 court security fee “on every conviction for a criminal offense . . . .” The questions here are whether the fee is subject to section 3’s general prohibition against retroactive application of a newly enacted law, and whether imposition of the fee for a crime committed before the effective date of the statute violates state and federal prohibitions against ex post facto laws. We hold that section 3 is not implicated and that the fee does not violate the prohibition against ex post facto laws.
Factu…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- People v. Dueñas, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. Santos, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.