Legal Opinion

People v. Briceno

California Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 2004No. S117641PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

At the March 7, 2000 Primary Election, the California electorate passed Proposition 21, the Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Act of 1998. Proposition 21 made significant changes in the law concerning gang-related crime. In this case, we decide whether Penal Code 1 section 1192.7, subdivision (c)(28) (section 1192.7(c)(28)), which adds to the list of serious felonies “any felony offense, which would also constitute a felony violation of Section 186.22,” applies only to the substantive offense of active participation in a criminal street gang defined in section…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. People v. Lam Thanh NguyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Beal Bank, SSB v. Arter & Hadden, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. BrookfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Briceno v. ScribnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API