Legal Opinion
Jenks v. Carey
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1933No. Docket No. 9098PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Theodore R. Jenks in his lifetime was employed by respondent Carey as an insurance salesman. He received a salary and commission. On Sunday, August 21, 1932, between 5 and 6 o'clock A.M., while at his home he received a telephone call from A.L. Dutra, who stated that he had met with an automobile accident and requested decedent to come to his assistance. Decedent agreed and drove his automobile to the scene of the accident. Upon his arrival he volunteered to take Dutra to the hospital. While proceeding to do so another accident happened, as the result of which decedent was injured…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
- City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Edwards v. Louisiana Forestry CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bernatas v. HonnertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Partoll v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1949
- Quon v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.