Legal Opinion
F. W. Woolworth Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided March 19, 1941No. S. F. No. 16468PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Petitioners seek by this writ of review to annul an award made by the respondent Industrial Accident Commission to one Alva Sivley.
Sivley had been employed by the Woolworth Company for a period of over three years as a stock clerk at its Post Street store in San Francisco. On the evening of November 21, 1939, Sivley and certain other employees worked overtime to decorate the store for the approaching holiday season. He was on duty from 8 o’clock in the morning until approximately 10:30 in the evening, with half an hour off for lunch and for dinner. Sivley had worked similar hours the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- G. L. Eastman Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Myers v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Leffert v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Burke v. B. F. Nelson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Martin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.