Legal Opinion

Partoll v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1949No. 8835PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE HONORABLE W. R. FLACHSENHAR, District Judge (sitting in place of Mr. Chief Justice Adair, disqualified):

This case is before this court on appeal from the district court where judgment was rendered affirming orders of the Industrial Accident Board denying compensation to claimant, Albert J. Partoll.

Appellant, an employee of respondent operating under Plan I of the Montana law, filed a claim for compensation for injuries sustained through an automobile accident while he was on his way home from his work as night time-keeper at respondent’s mill at Bonner, Montana, on Saturday about 2:30 a.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Landeen v. Toole County Refining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Vesel v. Jardine Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Copiah County Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Morgan v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Thornton v. Commissioner of Department of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Guarascio v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Peitz v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API