Legal Opinion
Daniel J. Sandstrom, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 20, 2004No. 03-7075PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Daniel J. Sandstrom (“Sandstrom”) appeals from the November 8, 2002 ruling of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“CAVC”), affirming the April 28, 1999 Board of Veterans Appeals (“BVA”) denial of his claim of entitlement to retroactive payment of Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) disability benefits at an increased statutory rate. Sandstrom v. Principi, 16 Vet.App. 481 (2002). Because in the absence of a clear, explicit waiver of sovereign immunity from liability for interest, the United States government (“the government”) pays all judgments and amounts due…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rezi P. Forshey, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- United States Ex Rel. Angarica v. BayardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Atkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Claudus G. Smith, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Sandstrom v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
3Cited by13 opinions
- Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- District of Columbia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Boston Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Dms Imaging, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Consumers Energy Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.