United States Ex Rel. Angarica v. Bayard
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. This was a petition for a mandamus. The writ was refused, and the relator sued out this writ of error. The ease is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchford
In this case, Lútzarda Angarica de la Rua, executrix of the estate of Joaquin Q-arcia de Angarica, deceased, presented a petition to the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, praying for a writ of mandamus to be issued to Thomas F. Bayard, Secretary of State of the United States, to pay the petitioner the amount of the interest or income derived from a certain investment of money. The case was heard in the first instance by the general term of that court, which rendered a judgment, on the 7th of December, 1885, dismissing the petition, with costs, on the ground that mandamus was not the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tillson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Harvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by117 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- In Re Theodore B. OLSONCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- United States v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.