Legal Opinion

Atkins v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 18, 1977No. 41-76; No. 132-76; No. 357-76PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Per curiam

In these three consolidated cases, 140 United States circuit and district judges have sued the Government to recover additional compensation they allege is due them under the Constitution of the United States for their services as federal judges since March 15, 1969.

Plaintiffs allege that each of them has been appointed to his present office pursuant to article II, section 2, of the *195Constitution, and that each of them has served in the office to which he was appointed during all or a part of the period commencing March 15, 1969, and extending up to the present time. These suits have been…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  5. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Larry Bolin, Kenneth David Pealock v. Richard W. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. The Second National Natural Gas Rate Cases American Public Gas Association v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. Jagdish Rai Chadha v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API