Legal Opinion
Sandstrom v. Principi
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided November 8, 2002No. 99-1440PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
IVERS, Judge, filed the opinion of the Court. KRAMER, Chief Judge, filed a concurring opinion.
IVERS, Judge:
The veteran, Daniel J. Sandstrom, appeals from an April 28, 1999, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision that denied a claim of entitlement to interest on the retroactive payment of VA disability compensation benefits, based on a grant of an increased rate of special monthly compensation (SMC). Record (R.) at 2. Both the veteran and the Secretary have submitted briefs, and the veteran has submitted a reply brief. This appeal is timely, and the Court has jurisdiction pursuant…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Adway Maggitt, Jr., Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Daniel J. Sandstrom, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004