Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 18, 2009No. 00-697 CPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEROW, Senior Judge.

Wisconsin Electric Company (“WE”) claims damages in excess of $90 million representing costs incurred in mitigating the government’s failure to perform its contractual obligations to collect, remove, transport and dispose of spent nuclear fuel (“SNF”) discharged from WE’s Point Beach nuclear generating facility on the shores of Lake Michigan. Electricity rates charged WE’s customers have included over $215 million dollars in fees WE paid to the government for this disposal service, which was to commence not later than January 31, 1998, but which has yet to occur.

The…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Franconia Associates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Boston Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Energy Northwest v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. Entergy Nuclear Fitzpatrick, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API