Legal Opinion

Peralta v. Durham

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 28, 2004No. 05-03-00934-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Justice MORRIS.

This is an appeal of an award of expenses granted pursuant to rule 215.4(b) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Lauren Peralta contends the trial court abused its discretion in granting the award against her based on her denial of certain requests for admission because the requests were improper and Charles Durham never proved the truth of the matters she denied. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

I

This case arose out of a traffic accident between Lauren Peralta and Charles Durham. Durham filed suit against Peralta…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Christiansen v. PrezelskiTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bodnow Corp. v. City of HondoTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of OklahomaTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Stelly v. PapaniaTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sherman v. Merit Office Portfolio, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boulet v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  2. In re WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. ConocoPhillips Company v. Noble Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. in Re Terri Cox Ferguson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  5. Zuniga v. MedinaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API