Legal Opinion

Bodnow Corp. v. City of Hondo

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1986No. C-5707PublishedCited by 216 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The issue in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion when it assessed joint and several monetary sanctions against the Bodnow Corporation for failing to comply with proper discovery requests. We hold that the trial court did.

Bodnow intervened in a lawsuit in which several parties (the “original plaintiffs”) were seeking a refund of ad valorem taxes that they had paid to the City of Hondo and Hondo Independent School District. Bod-now only intervened against HISD. After granting summary judgment for the City and HISD, the trial court imposed two discovery sanctions…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Street v. Second Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ebeling v. GawlikCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Jarrett v. WarholaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985

4Cited by216 opinions

  1. Cire v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re ReeceTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Braden v. DowneyTexas Supreme Court · 1991

211 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API