Legal Opinion

Christiansen v. Prezelski

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1990No. C-9246PublishedCited by 290 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this case is whether a court of appeals may properly find reversible error when it does not have a complete record of the case before it and the appellant has not complied with Tex.R.App.P. 53(d). We hold that it cannot. Accordingly, we grant the application for writ of error and, without hearing oral argument, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and render judgment for the Petitioner; See Tex.R.App.P. 133(b).

Robert L. Christiansen, D.D.S., performed oral surgery on Gloria Prezelski. She subsequently sued him for malpractice. Following a jury trial, judgment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gomez Leon v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Escontrias v. ApodacaTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Prezelski v. Christiansen, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989

3Cited by290 opinions

  1. Till v. Thomas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  2. Willms v. Americas Tire Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  3. Schafer v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc. v. BethuneTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Shoemake v. Fogel, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1992

285 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API