Legal Opinion

Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of Oklahoma

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1969No. B-624PublishedCited by 186 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

The principal question to be decided in this case is whether the record shows as a matter of law that plaintiffs own the partnership interests in a limited partnership known as 21 Turtle Creek Square, Ltd., hereinafter referred to as 21 TCS, Ltd. They claim to have acquired the same by assignment from Kirkeby-Natus Corporation, which held a lien thereon. They also claim, and the trial court held as a matter of law, that the principal defendant, Dr. Daniel Gevinson, had judicially admitted, and was estopped to deny, that Kirkeby-Natus had acquired title to the partnership…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. James T. Taylor & Son, Inc. v. Arlington Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Griffin v. Superior Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  4. McGuire v. City of DallasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  5. McGuire v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by186 opinions

  1. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. AuldTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Transport Insurance Co. v. FairclothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Collora v. NavarroTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Mendoza v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980

181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API