Gevinson v. Manhattan Construction Co. of Oklahoma
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Justice.
The principal question to be decided in this case is whether the record shows as a matter of law that plaintiffs own the partnership interests in a limited partnership known as 21 Turtle Creek Square, Ltd., hereinafter referred to as 21 TCS, Ltd. They claim to have acquired the same by assignment from Kirkeby-Natus Corporation, which held a lien thereon. They also claim, and the trial court held as a matter of law, that the principal defendant, Dr. Daniel Gevinson, had judicially admitted, and was estopped to deny, that Kirkeby-Natus had acquired title to the partnership…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- James T. Taylor & Son, Inc. v. Arlington Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Griffin v. Superior Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- McGuire v. City of DallasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
- McGuire v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by186 opinions
- Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. AuldTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- HOLY CROSS CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST v. WolfTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Transport Insurance Co. v. FairclothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Collora v. NavarroTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Mendoza v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.