Legal Opinion
Fort Carson Support Services v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 19, 2006No. Nos. 05-674C, 05-715CPublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WOLSKI, Judge.
This post-award bid protest was before the Court on cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiffs Fort Carson Support Services (“FCSS”) and The Ginn Group, Inc. (“TGG”) separately challenged the award of a contract to intervenor KIRA, Inc. (“KIRA”). For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES the motions of FCSS and TGG, and GRANTS the cross-motions of the government and KIRA.
I. BACKGROUND
A. The Solicitation
On April 13, 2004, the United States Army issued solicitation number W911RZ-04-R-0002 (“Solicitation”), requesting proposals for a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- PlanetSpace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Tech Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Blackwater Lodge & Training Center, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Vanguard Recovery Assistance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- MORI Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.