United States v. Shearer
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The appellant was charged with wrongful appropriation of an M-16 rifle in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 921. Consistent with his pleas he was found guilty by the military judge sitting alone, and was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for four months, forfeiture of $100.00 per month for four months and reduction to the grade of Private (E-l).
I
Appellant’s first assignment of error is that the court that tried and convicted him was without jurisdiction, because the convening authority failed…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- United States v. AlefUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States v. HaimsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. ParkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. CarmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. MecklerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. PulliamU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. VargasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997