Legal Opinion

United States v. Shearer

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 5, 1978No. SPCM 13401PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The appellant was charged with wrongful appropriation of an M-16 rifle in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 921. Consistent with his pleas he was found guilty by the military judge sitting alone, and was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for four months, forfeiture of $100.00 per month for four months and reduction to the grade of Private (E-l).

I

Appellant’s first assignment of error is that the court that tried and convicted him was without jurisdiction, because the convening authority failed…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. United States v. AlefUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. United States v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. United States v. HaimsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. ParkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  2. United States v. CarmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. MecklerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  4. United States v. PulliamU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. VargasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API