Legal Opinion

United States v. Vargas

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided August 6, 1997No. NMCM 96 00755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNNE, Judge:

We have examined the record of trial, the assignment of error,1 and the Government’s response thereto. The findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed.

The appellant contends, for the first time, that his court-martial was improperly convened and could not sentence him because the record does not affirmatively show that the individual officer who referred his case to trial personally selected the members of the court-martial. See Art. 25(d)(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dynes v. HooverSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Runkle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. United States v. RyanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. DaigleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. BuntingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. GilchristArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  2. United States v. WiseNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API