Legal Opinion

Fitch v. Green

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1913No. 2736PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Action by Richard Green against Harry C. Fitch. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

In -the opinion plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant and defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.

On or about June 26, 1909, plaintiff borrowed of defendant $10, according to his testimony, or $13, according to defendant’s testimony. In consideration of this loan and, according to defendant’s testimony, which is denied by plaintiff, an agreed charge of $1.75 to cover notary and filing fees and defendant’s services in drawing note and mortgage, plaintiff executed to defendant his note for $14.75, with interest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  2. State v. MurphyNevada Supreme Court · 1897
  3. City of Guthrie v. SwanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. City of Guthrie v. SwanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Orr v. MallonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Riddle v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. United States Supply Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Claude Neon Electrical Products, Inc. v. Brilliant Tube Sign Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
  5. Civic Center Garage, Inc. v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API