Legal Opinion
Riddle v. Hudson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 11, 1917No. 5891PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThacker, J.
The plaintiffs in error will be designated as defendants, and the defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.
On July 9, 1904, the defendant Finis E. Riddle and one E. G. Owen had, for a valuable consideration, undertaken to convey to Bohart & Wells certain lands, including the following tract situated in Grady county, Okla., to which said Finis E. Riddle then held, in part for himself and in part in trust for his associate, E. 6. Owen, a purported title by virtue of a purported conveyance of the N. E. % of the S. W. ]i of section 7, township 6…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ball v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Barnett v. HugheySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Faller v. Davis Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Logan v. MoulderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1839
- Brady v. Bank of Commerce of CowetaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- New York Casualty Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- First National Bank of Poteau v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Crane Co. v. James McHugh Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Petroleum Refractionating Corp. v. Kendrick Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Herron v. HarbourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.